4.7 Article

Drosophila cells use nanotube-like structures to transfer dsRNA and RNAi machinery between cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep27085

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut Pasteur (Paris)
  2. France-BioImaging infrastructure network - French National Research Agency [ANR-10-INSB-04]
  3. Region Ile-de-France (program DIM-Malinf)
  4. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-JCJC-0045-01]
  5. European Research Council [ERC StG 242703, ERC CoG 615220]
  6. LabEx IBEID (Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases) program
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-JCJC-0045] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tunnelling nanotubes and cytonemes function as highways for the transport of organelles, cytosolic and membrane-bound molecules, and pathogens between cells. During viral infection in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, a systemic RNAi antiviral response is established presumably through the transport of a silencing signal from one cell to another via an unknown mechanism. Because of their role in cell-cell communication, we investigated whether nanotube-like structures could be a mediator of the silencing signal. Here, we describe for the first time in the context of a viral infection the presence of nanotube-like structures in different Drosophila cell types. These tubules, made of actin and tubulin, were associated with components of the RNAi machinery, including Argonaute 2, double-stranded RNA, and CG4572. Moreover, they were more abundant during viral, but not bacterial, infection. Super resolution structured illumination microscopy showed that Argonaute 2 and tubulin reside inside the tubules. We propose that nanotube-like structures are one of the mechanisms by which Argonaute 2, as part of the antiviral RNAi machinery, is transported between infected and non-infected cells to trigger systemic antiviral immunity in Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据