4.7 Article

The PTEN phosphatase functions cooperatively with the Fanconi anemia proteins in DNA crosslink repair

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep36439

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R01HL101977]
  2. Rhode Island IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (RI-INBRE) grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM103430]
  3. Cancer Council Victoria, Victorian Government IOS program
  4. National Breast Cancer Foundation career development award
  5. Rhode Island Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (RI-EPSCoR) grant from the National Science Foundation [1004057]
  6. National Breast Cancer Foundation [ECF-12-02] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Office of Integrative Activities
  8. Office Of The Director [1004057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disease characterized by bone marrow failure and increased cancer risk. The FA proteins function primarily in DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair. Here, we have examined the role of the PTEN phosphatase in this process. We have established that PTEN-deficient cells, like FA cells, exhibit increased cytotoxicity, chromosome structural aberrations, and error-prone mutagenic DNA repair following exposure to ICL-inducing agents. The increased ICL sensitivity of PTEN-deficient cells is caused, in part, by elevated PLK1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of FANCM, constitutive FANCM polyubiquitination and degradation, and the consequent inefficient assembly of the FA core complex, FANCD2, and FANCI into DNA repair foci. We also establish that PTEN function in ICL repair is dependent on its protein phosphatase activity and ability to be SUMOylated, yet is independent of its lipid phosphatase activity. Finally, via epistasis analysis, we demonstrate that PTEN and FANCD2 function cooperatively in ICL repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据