4.6 Article

New approach of modifying the anatase to rutile transition temperature in TiO2 photocatalysts

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 97, 页码 95232-95238

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra19759k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Technology Sligo President's Bursary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pure synthetic titanium dioxide, the anatase to rutile phase transition usually occurs between the temperatures of 600 degrees C and 700 degrees C. The phase transition temperature can be altered by various methods, including modifying the precursor or by adding dopant or modifier to the TiO2 sample. In an attempt to investigate the phase transition using aromatic carboxylic acids, the current study examines the impact of increasing concentrations of benzoic acid (1 : 0, 1 : 1, 1 : 4 and 1 : 8 molar ratio TiO2 : benzoic acid) on anatase to rutile transition. The samples were characterised using Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies. At 500 degrees C, all samples contained only anatase. At 600 degrees C, the 1 : 1, 1 : 4 and 1 : 8 samples contain only anatase and the control (which contains no modifier) was a mixture of 27% anatase and 73% rutile. At 700 degrees C, the 1 : 1 molar ratio sample contained 50% anatase/rutile, 1 : 4 and 1 : 8 molar ratio samples were observed to have a majority of anatase, 76% and 71% respectively. When the temperature was increased to 800 degrees C, the sample with the 1 : 4 molar ratio contained 10% anatase and at the same temperature the 1 : 8 ratio sample contained 7% anatase; the remaining samples (1 : 0 and 1 : 1) at this temperature contained only rutile. These results show that there is a significant % anatase still present when the doped samples were calcined to 700 degrees C when compared with the control (100% rutile). There are small amounts of the anatase phase in the 1 : 4 and 1 : 8 samples at 800 degrees C. Therefore, benzoic acid has induced a delay in the rutile formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据