4.6 Article

Anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed highly reactive (001) facets as an efficient photoanode for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 72, 页码 67968-67975

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra10628e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61404039]
  2. Heilongjiang Province Foundation for Returned Chinese Scholars [LC201401]
  3. Educational Commission of Heilongjiang Province of China [12531Z006]
  4. technology project of returned overseas students of Heilongjiang Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) anatase TiO2 nanosheets (TiO2-NSs) with exposed (001) crystal planes were obtained via a simple one-pot hydrothermal route. And they were utilized to fabricate efficient CdSe quantum dot sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) for the first time. A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.01% was attained with the TiO2-NS based cell, which is 63% higher than that of the TiO2 nanoparticle (TiO2-NP) based cell under the same conditions. The increased photovoltaic performance mainly profits from more quantum-dot (QD) loading onto TiO2-NSs due to large pore size and the strong absorption ability with the carboxylate linker of colloidal quantum dots capped using bifunctional linker molecules in the TiO2-NSs with exposed (001) crystal planes, which lead to an enhancement of light harvesting efficiency and thus significantly enhanced short-circuit photocurrent. Furthermore, the good crystallization, large particle size and low surface area of the TiO2-NSs also result in fewer defects and provide efficient electron transfer pathways and prolong electron lifetime. Meanwhile, the large pore size of the TiO2-NS photoanode will also diminish the infiltration resistance of the electrolyte, which is helpful to regenerate the quantum-dots (QDs). The excellent properties of the 2D anatase TiO2 nanosheet (TiO2-NS) with exposed (001) crystal planes make it a promising candidate as a photoanode material for highly efficient QDSSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据