4.6 Article

The effects of nonmetal dopants on the electronic, optical, and catalytic performances of monolayer WSe2 by a first-principles study

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 115, 页码 114109-114122

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra15697e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402274, 21401180, 51402277]
  2. Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province for Returned Researcher
  3. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping modifies the electronic, optical, and catalytic behavior of materials through the newly formed chemical bonds and the localized electrons. With the aid of first-principles calculations, the electronic, optical, and catalytic performances of the nonmetal (NM = H, B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl, As, Br, Te, or I)doped monolayer WSe2 were investigated. The results showed that the NM dopants substitute preferentially for Se under a W-rich condition and H, F, Cl, Br, and I atoms are willing to locate at the interstitial site. The electron-clouds around the dopants and nearby W or Se atoms were altered by the newly formed W-NM or Se-NM bonds, with the differences determined by the bonding strength between them. The band gap, optical absorption edge, and intensities were altered or shifted by less than 0.08 eV, 32 nm, and 9.5%, respectively. The H, F, P, Cl, As, Br, and I dopants were conductive to separating the photogenerated e(-)/h(+) pairs, whereas the B, C, Si, and Te dopants became recombination centers for the photogenerated e/h(+) pairs. Compared with pristine monolayer WSe2, NM atoms with odd free electrons reduced the reduction potential by 0.39-0.71 eV and enhanced the oxidation potential by 0.45-0.75 eV. Thus, we can adjust the redox potentials of monolayer WSe2 by introducing different kinds of NM impurities for various catalytic reactions, and the H- ,F- , P- , Cl- , As- , Br- , and I-doped specimens have excellent photocatalysis capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据