4.6 Article

Microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots-zinc oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes and their application in electrochemical sensors for the simultaneous determination of hydroquinone and catechol

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 116, 页码 115317-115325

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra14363f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of the National General Administration of Quality Supervision of the Fujian province, China [2012QK053]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [2012D136]
  3. Education Bureau of the Fujian province, China [JA13195, JAT160875, JAT160302]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhangzhou [ZZ2016J31]
  5. Science and Technology Foundation of the Fujian provincial bureau of quality and technical supervision [FJQI2012029, FJQI2013108]
  6. Training Programme Foundation for Excellent Youth Research Talents of the Fujian's Universities (Fujian Education Section) [23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, efficient, and rapid microwave-assisted synthesis was developed to prepare carbon dots-zinc oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CDs-ZnO/MWCNTs) composite. The CDs-ZnO/MWCNT material was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The electrode modified with the CDs-ZnO/MWCNTs composite was applied for the simultaneous determination of hydroquinone (HQ) and catechol (CC) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH = 4.5). The anodic potential difference (Delta E-pa) between HQ and CC was 104 mV, which indicated that the modified electrode could simultaneously detect HQ and CC. The calibration curves for both HQ and CC were obtained in the range from 5.0 to 200 mu M, and the detection limits (S/N = 3) were 0.02 mu M and 0.04 mu M, respectively. The modified electrode was applied to determine HQ and CC in tap water and the recovery rates were 99.3-105.4% for HQ and 104.3-110.1% for CC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据