4.6 Article

CO2 methanation over a Ni based ordered mesoporous catalyst for the production of synthetic natural gas

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 34, 页码 28489-28499

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra01139j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503113, 21577065, 21503142]
  2. Singapore MOE grant [R143-000-542-112]
  3. Singapore National Research Foundation CREATE-SPURc program [R-143-001-205-592]
  4. Jiangsu Province Government Research Platform Grant
  5. NUSRI Seed Fund
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni based catalysts have been considered as ideal candidates for the CO2 methanation reaction to generate synthetic natural gas owing to its high activity and low cost. In the present manuscript, we described a kind of ordered mesoporous NiO-Al2O3 composite metal oxide, fabricated by a one-step evaporation induced self-assembly (EISA) strategy, which was utilized as the catalyst for CO2 methanation. The obtained material was characterized by XRD, N-2 adsorption-desorption, TEM-EDS, H-2-TPR, and XPS techniques. The mesoporous catalyst with a large specific surface area (232.8 m(2) g(-1)), big pore volume (0.43 cm(3) g(-1)), tunable pore diameter (9.5 nm), strong metal-mesoporous framework interaction, and outstanding thermal stability (up to 800 degrees C) had a better catalytic performance than traditional non-mesoporous and supported reference catalysts. The ordered interconnected mesoporous network was beneficial to the mass diffusion of the gaseous reactants and enhanced the catalytic performance by providing sufficient accessible metallic active centers for the gaseous reactants. Besides, the Ni metallic nanoparticles could be stabilized via the space confinement effect of the mesoporous framework, finally reinforcing the catalytic stability. Generally, the presently reported ordered mesoporous NiO-Al2O3 composite oxide promises to be a potential catalyst candidate for CO2 methanation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据