4.6 Article

Degradation mechanism of a junction-free transparent silver network electrode

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 77, 页码 73769-73775

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra15135c

关键词

-

资金

  1. General Research Fund (GRF) [HKU 710313E, 17200314]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  3. Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme, Innovation and Technology Support Programme [NHKU715/14, ITS/186/13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, junction-free silver network electrodes with a range of optical transparencies and sheet resistances are developed by using thermal evaporation in the cracked regions of polymer templates that have conformal coatings. In contrast to silver nanowire or carbon nanotube transparent conductive electrodes, there is no contact resistance of the silver mesh electrodes in the silver network, and no post process annealing treatment is required. We focus on investigating the degradation mechanisms of a silver network without junctions under different bias currents. We use CCD-based thermoreflectance microscopy to investigate the temperature variations of the network and locate the hot spots along the different conductive paths. From the distribution of the wasted heat, we notice that the reliability of the network strongly depends on the uniformity and percentage of areal coverage which can be adjusted by different spin-coating speed. A more regular network with an areal coverage of 18% can accommodate 2.6 times the bias current (140 mA) as opposed to that with an areal coverage of only 9% (54 mA) before breaking down. A finite element model is developed to simulate the temperature distribution and predict the breakdown locations of the transparent silver network. Based on the thermoreflectance and scanning electron microscope images of the network under different levels of degradation, we confirm that the primary cause of breakdowns is thermal assisted electromigration in the transparent silver network in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据