4.3 Article

Paraoxonase 3 inhibits cell proliferation and serves as a prognostic predictor in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 43, 页码 70045-70057

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12145

关键词

paraoxonase 3; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognostic predictor; cell proliferation; cDNA microarray

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB542102]
  2. State key infection disease project of China [2012ZX10002010, 2012ZX10002016]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups, NSFC, China [81521091, 81372207]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paraoxonase 3 (PON3) exerts prominent anti-inflammation and anti-oxidation properties mainly at the cellular level, and is primarily expressed in the liver. However, its role in HCC remains unexplored. Here, we investigated the expression pattern, clinical significance, and function of PON3 in HCC. PON3 mRNA and protein levels were respectively determined in two large cohorts using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tissue microarray. We found that PON3 was downregulated in most HCCs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test showed that PON3 downregulation predicted shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) time in all HCC patients, especially early-stage HCC patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that the PON3 downregulation was an independent risk factor for RFS and OS. Gain-and loss-of-function experiments revealed that PON3 suppressed cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro, which was attributed to its cell-cycle arrest effect. In addition, microarray analysis showed that some pro-proliferative genes were elevated when PON3 was knockdown, and these genes possibly involved in the underlying mechanisms. In conclusion, our studies reveal the cell proliferation inhibitory function of PON3 and offer a potential prognostic predictor and therapeutic target for HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据