4.3 Article

Thigh muscle size and vascular function after blood flow-restricted elastic band training in older women

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 33595-33607

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9564

关键词

sarcopenia; vascular occlusion; muscle hypertrophy; resistance exercise; arterial stiffness; Gerotarget

资金

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [24300189, 25750288]
  2. Nakatomi Foundation
  3. Vehicle Racing Commemorative Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25750288, 15K01553] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the effect of elastic band training with blood flow restriction (BFR) on thigh muscle size and vascular function in older women. Older women were divided into three groups: low-intensity elastic band BFR training (BFR-Tr, n = 10), middle-to high-intensity elastic band training (MH-Tr, n = 10), and no training (Ctrl, n = 10) groups. BFR-Tr and MH-Tr groups performed squat and knee extension exercises using elastic band, 2 days/week for 12 weeks. During BFR-Tr exercise session, subjects wore pressure cuffs around the most proximal region of both thighs. The following measurements were taken before (pre) and 3-5 days after (post) the final training session: MRI-measured muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at mid-thigh, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of knee extension, central systolic blood pressure (c-SBP), central-augmentation index (c-AIx), cardio-ankle vascular index testing (CAVI), ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI). Quadriceps muscle CSA (6.9%) and knee extension MVIC (13.7%) were increased (p < 0.05) in the BFR-Tr group, but not in the MH-Tr and the Ctrl groups. Regarding c-SBP, c-AIx, CAVI and ABI, there were no changes between pre- and post-results among the three groups. Elastic band BFR training increases thigh muscle CSA as well as maximal muscle strength, but does not decrease vascular function in older women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据