4.3 Article

Screening of candidate G-quadruplex ligands for the human c-KIT promotorial region and their effects in multiple in-vitro models

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 16, 页码 21658-21675

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7808

关键词

c-KIT; G-quadruplex; in-vitro models; G4-ligands; anthraquinone

资金

  1. University of Padua [CPDA114388, CPDA147272/14]
  2. Regione del Veneto [DGR 2862-28/12/2012]
  3. Leonardo da Vinci Lifelong Learning Programme [2013-1-PT1-LEO02-15932]
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul cancro (AIRC)
  5. INSERM
  6. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stabilization of G-quadruplex (G4) structures in promoters is a novel promising strategy to regulate gene expression at transcriptional and translational levels. c-KIT proto-oncogene encodes for a tyrosine kinase receptor. It is involved in several physiological processes, but it is also dysregulated in many diseases, including cancer. Two G-rich sequences able to fold into G4, have been identified in c-KIT proximal promoter, thus representing suitable targets for anticancer intervention. Herein, we screened an in house library of compounds for the recognition of these G4 elements and we identified three promising ligands. Their G4-binding properties were analyzed and related to their antiproliferative, transcriptional and post-transcriptional effects in MCF7 and HGC27 cell lines. Besides c-KIT, the transcriptional analysis covered a panel of oncogenes known to possess G4 in their promoters. From these studies, an anthraquinone derivative (AQ1) was found to efficiently downregulate c-KIT mRNA and protein in both cell lines. The targeted activity of AQ1 was confirmed using c-KIT-dependent cell lines that present either c-KIT mutations or promoter engineered (i.e., a155, HMC1.2 and ROSA cells). Present results indicate AQ1 as a promising compound for the target therapy of c-KIT-dependent tumors, worth of further and in depth molecular investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据