4.7 Article

Detection of 12.5% and 25% Salt Reduction in Bread in a Remote Indigenous Australian Community

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/nu8030169

关键词

reformulation; bread; Indigenous Australian consumers; detection; salt; acceptance

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [631947]
  2. Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute (APHCRI from Commonwealth of Australia by the Department of Health)
  3. National Heart Foundation (NHF) Future Leader Fellowship [ID: 100085]
  4. NHF Future Leader Fellowship [ID: 100085]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program [631947]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food reformulation is an important strategy to reduce the excess salt intake observed in remote Indigenous Australia. We aimed to examine whether 12.5% and 25% salt reduction in bread is detectable, and, if so, whether acceptability is changed, in a sample of adults living in a remote Indigenous community in the Northern Territory of Australia. Convenience samples were recruited for testing of reduced-salt (300 and 350 mg Na/100 g) versus Standard (~400 mg Na/100 g) white and wholemeal breads (n = 62 for white; n = 72 for wholemeal). Triangle testing was used to examine whether participants could detect a difference between the breads. Liking of each bread was also measured; standard consumer acceptability questionnaires were modified to maximise cultural appropriateness and understanding. Participants were unable to detect a difference between Standard and reduced-salt breads (all p values > 0.05 when analysed using binomial probability). Further, as expected, liking of the breads was not changed with salt reduction (all p values > 0.05 when analysed using ANOVA). Reducing salt in products commonly purchased in remote Indigenous communities has potential as an equitable, cost-effective and sustainable strategy to reduce population salt intake and reduce risk of chronic disease, without the barriers associated with strategies that require individual behaviour change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据