4.7 Article

Numerical study of shock/boundary layer interaction in supersonic overexpanded nozzles

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 158-168

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. French aeronautical and aerospace industry: SNECMA-Moteurs, SAFRAN group] [002-037 G]
  2. Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif' - [Centre de Calcul Recherche et Technologie/Centre Informatique de l'Enseignement Superieur/Institut de Developpement et des Ressources en Informatique Scientifique] [2013-0211640]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical study, using a mixed finite element/finite volume method on unstructured meshes adapted for compressible flows, is conducted to investigate turbulent boundary-layer separation in overexpanded subscale supersonic nozzles including shock/shock and shock/boundary layer interactions. Two test-cases are investigated, namely a TIC (Truncated Ideal Contour) nozzle and a TOP (Thrust Optimized Parabolic contour) nozzle with a secondary jet injection. Particular attention is paid to the appearance of a recirculation region downstream of the Mach disc as well as in the vicinity of the secondary nozzle exit. The results so obtained are analyzed and compared with the experimental data. The results suggest that very different shock structures and flow separation may appear depending on the nozzle contour as well as on the operating pressure and temperature ratios. In the case of TOP nozzle, the simulations reveal the existence of a small recirculation bubble at the vicinity of the secondary injection, due to a shock/boundary layer interaction. In addition, it has been shown that, at high temperature ratios, compressibility effects on the growth rate of the mixing layer, which develops between the main stream and the secondary jet injection, become significant and cannot be neglected in the computation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据