4.4 Review

Working principle and application of magnetic separation for biomedical diagnostic at high- and low-field gradients

期刊

INTERFACE FOCUS
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0048

关键词

low gradient magnetic separation; high gradient magnetic separation; magnetophoresis; magnetic particles; biomedical diagnostic; disease detection

类别

资金

  1. International Foundation for Sciences (IFS)
  2. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) [6050324/I100]
  3. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) grant from Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) [6071269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic separation is a versatile technique used in sample preparation for diagnostic purpose. For such application, an external magnetic field is applied to drive the separation of target entity (e.g. bacteria, viruses, parasites and cancer cells) from a complex raw sample in order to ease the subsequent task(s) for disease diagnosis. This separation process not only can be achieved via the utilization of high magnetic field gradient, but also, in most cases, low magnetic field gradient with magnitude less than 100 T m(-1) is equally feasible. It is the aim of this review paper to summarize the usage of both high gradient magnetic separation and low gradient magnetic separation (LGMS) techniques in this area of research. It is noteworthy that effectiveness of the magnetic separation process not only determines the outcome of a diagnosis but also directly influences its accuracy as well as sensing time involved. Therefore, understanding the factors that simultaneously influence the efficiency of both magnetic separation process and target detection is necessary. Moreover, for LGMS, there are several important considerations that should be taken into account in order to ensure its successful implementation. Hence, this review paper aims to provide an overview to relate all this crucial information by linking the magnetic separation theory to biomedical diagnostic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据