4.8 Article

High Performance Na-CuCl2 Rechargeable Battery toward Room Temperature ZEBRA-Type Battery

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600862

关键词

copper chloride; inorganic electrolytes; room temperature; sodium batteries; ZEBRA-type batteries

资金

  1. Samsung Research Funding Center for Future Technology [SRFC-MA1501-07]
  2. Energy Efficiency and Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea [20132020000260]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20132020000260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite a recent increase in the attention given to sodium rechargeable battery systems, they should be further advanced in terms of their energy density and reliability to successfully penetrate the rechargeable battery market. Here, a new room temperature ZEBRA-type Na-CuCl2 rechargeable battery is demonstrated that employs CuCl2 cathode material and nonflammable inorganic liquid electrolyte. The cathode delivers a high energy density of approximate to 580 Wh kg(-1) with superior capacity retention over 1000 cycles as well as a high round-trip efficiency of approximate to 97%, which has never been obtained in an organic electrolyte system and high-temperature ZEBRA-type battery. These excellent electrochemical performances are mainly attributed to the use of the SO2-based inorganic electrolyte, which guarantees a reversible conversion reaction between CuCl2 and CuCl with NaCl. It is also demonstrated that the proposed battery chemistry can be extended to other copper halide materials including CuBr2 and CuF2, which also show highly promising battery performances as cathode materials for the Na-Cu halide battery system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据