4.7 Article

Clearance of autophagy-associated dying retinal pigment epithelial cells - a possible source for inflammation in age-related macular degeneration

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2016.133

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Social Fund [TAMOP-4.2.4.A/2-11/1-2012-0001, TAMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0023, TAMOP-4.2.2. A-11/1/KONV-2012-0025]
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  3. OTKA [NK 105046]
  4. National Brain Research Program [KTIA_NAP_13-A_III/9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells can undergo different forms of cell death, including autophagy-associated cell death during age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Failure of macrophages or dendritic cells (DCs) to engulf the different dying cells in the retina may result in the accumulation of debris and progression of AMD. ARPE-19 and primary human RPE cells undergo autophagy-associated cell death upon serum depletion and oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Autophagy was revealed by elevated light-chain-3 II (LC3-II) expression and electron microscopy, while autophagic flux was confirmed by blocking the autophago-lysosomal fusion using chloroquine (CQ) in these cells. The autophagy-associated dying RPE cells were engulfed by human macrophages, DCs and living RPE cells in an increasing and time-dependent manner. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-methyladenine (3-MA) decreased the engulfment of the autophagy-associated dying cells by macrophages, whereas sorting out the GFP-LC3-positive/autophagic cell population or treatment by the glucocorticoid triamcinolone (TC) enhanced it. Increased amounts of IL-6 and IL-8 were released when autophagy-associated dying RPEs were engulfed by macrophages. Our data suggest that cells undergoing autophagy-associated cell death engage in clearance mechanisms guided by professional and nonprofessional phagocytes, which is accompanied by inflammation as part of an in vitro modeling of AMD pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据