4.2 Article

The acetaminophen metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) inhibits glutathione synthetase in vitro; a clue to the mechanism of 5-oxoprolinuric acidosis?

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 164-175

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2016.1166533

关键词

Acetaminophen toxicity; glutathione deficiency; gamma-glutamyl cycle; protein arylation

资金

  1. Southampton Hospital Charity, Southampton General Hospital, UK [1051543, 0182]
  2. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R15GM086833]
  3. Texas Woman's University Research Enhancement Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Metabolic acidosis due to accumulation of L-5-oxoproline is a rare, poorly understood, disorder associated with acetaminophen treatment in malnourished patients with chronic morbidity. L-5-Oxoprolinuria signals abnormal functioning of the gamma-glutamyl cycle, which recycles and synthesises glutathione. Inhibition of glutathione synthetase (GS) by N-acetylp- benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) could contribute to 5-oxoprolinuric acidosis in such patients. We investigated the interaction of NAPQI with GS in vitro. 2. Peptide mapping of co-incubated NAPQI and GS using mass spectrometry demonstrated binding of NAPQI with cysteine-422 of GS, which is known to be essential for GS activity. Computational docking shows that NAPQI is properly positioned for covalent bonding with cysteine-422 via Michael addition and hence supports adduct formation. 3. Co-incubation of 0.77 mu M of GS with NAPQI (25-400 mu M) decreased enzyme activity by 1689%. Inhibition correlated strongly with the concentration of NAPQI and was irreversible. 4. NAPQI binds covalently to GS causing irreversible enzyme inhibition in vitro. This is an important novel biochemical observation. It is the first indication that NAPQI may inhibit glutathione synthesis, which is pivotal in NAPQI detoxification. Further studies are required to investigate its biological significance and its role in 5-oxoprolinuric acidosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据