4.5 Article

Application of Fenton oxidation to reduce the toxicity of mixed parabens

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1867-1875

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.374

关键词

Fenton; hydroxyl radicals; parabens mixture; toxicity

资金

  1. Portugal/Poland Bilateral Cooperation Project
  2. Foundation for Polish Science within the START scholarship
  3. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BD/63653/2009]
  4. IFCT programme [IF/00215/2014]
  5. European Social Fund
  6. Human Potential Operational Programme
  7. [UID/NEU/04539/2013]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/63653/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of the present work were to assess the application of a chemical process to degrade a mixture of parabens and determine the influence of a natural river water matrix on toxicity. Model effluents containing either a single compound, namely methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, benzylparaben or p-hydroxybenzoic acid, or to mimic realistic conditions a mixture of the six compounds was used. Fenton process was applied to reduce the organic charge and toxic properties of the model effluents. The efficiency of the decontamination has been investigated using a chemical as well as a toxicological approach. The potential reduction of the effluents' toxicity after Fenton treatment was evaluated by assessing (i) Vibrio fischeri luminescence inhibition, (ii) lethal effects amongst freshwater Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea), and (iii) the impact on mammalian neuronal activity using brain slices. From the environmental point of view such a broad toxicity analysis has been performed for the first time. The results indicate that Fenton reaction is an effective method for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand of a mixture of parabens and their toxicity to V. fischeri and C. fluminea. However, no important differences were found between raw and treated samples in regard to mammalian neuronal activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据