4.8 Article

A novel approach for stabilizing fresh urine by calcium hydroxide addition

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 361-369

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.007

关键词

Urine; Source separation; Stabilization of urea; Inhibition of urease; Phosphorus recovery

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1069570, OPP1111293]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1111293, OPP1069570] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the prevention of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in fresh urine by increasing the pH with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)) powder. The amount of Ca(OH)(2) dissolving in fresh urine depends significantly on the composition of the urine. The different urine compositions used in our simulations showed that between 4.3 and 5.8 g Ca(OH)(2) dissolved in 1 L of urine at 25 degrees C. At this temperature, the pH at saturation is 12.5 and is far above the pH of 11, which we identified as the upper limit for enzymatic urea hydrolysis. However, temperature has a strong effect on the saturation pH, with higher values being achieved at lower temperatures. Based on our results, we recommend a dosage of 10 g Ca(OH)(2) L-1 of fresh urine to ensure solid Ca(OH)(2) always remains in the urine reactor which ensures sufficiently high pH values. Besides providing sufficient Ca(OH)(2), the temperature has to be kept in a certain range to prevent chemical urea hydrolysis. At temperatures below 14 degrees C, the saturation pH is higher than 13, which favors chemical urea hydrolysis. We chose a precautionary upper temperature of 40 degrees C because the rate of chemical urea hydrolysis increases at higher temperatures but this should be confirmed with kinetic studies. By considering the boundaries for pH and temperature developed in this study, urine can be stabilized effectively with Ca(OH)(2) thereby simplifying later treatment processes or making direct use easier. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据