4.7 Article

Decolorization of azo dyes Orange G using hydrodynamic cavitation coupled with heterogeneous Fenton process

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 302-310

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.08.001

关键词

Hydrodynamic cavitation; Zero-valent iron; Fenton process; Orange G; Decolorization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906080, 20977083]
  2. Analyzing and Testing Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [2009F70014]
  3. Youth Fund Zhejiang Gongshang University
  4. Zhejiang Xinmiao Talents Program [2015R408031]
  5. Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Ningbo City [2015C110019]
  6. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work demonstrates the application of the combination of hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) and the heterogeneous Fenton process (HF, Fe-0/H2O2) for the decolorization of azo dye Orange G (OG). The effects of main affecting operation conditions such as the inlet fluid pressure, initial concentration of OG, H2O2 and zero valent iron (ZVI), the fixed position of ZVI, and medium pH on decolorization efficiency were discussed with guidelines for selection of optimum parameters. The results revealed that the acidic conditions are preferred for OG decolorizaiton. The decolorization rate increased with increasing H2O2 and ZVI concentration and decreased with increasing OG initial concentration. Besides, the decolorization rate was strongly dependent on the fixed position of ZVI. The analysis results of degradation products using liquid chromatography-ESI-TOF mass spectrometry revealed that the degradation mechanism of OG proceeds mainly via reductive cleavage of the azo linkage due to the attack of hydroxyl radical. The present work has conclusively established that the combination of HC and HF can be more energy efficient and gives higher decolorization rate of OG as compared with HC and HF alone. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据