4.3 Article

The history of Old World camelids in the light of molecular genetics

期刊

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 905-913

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1032-7

关键词

Camelus bactrianus; Camelus ferus; Camelus dromedarius; Domestication; Genetic resource management; Genetic diversity

资金

  1. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF)
  2. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) [P24706-B25]
  3. Austrian Academy of Sciences [11506]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24706] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24706] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Old World camels have come into the focus as sustainable livestock species, unique in their morphological and physiological characteristics and capable of providing vital products even under extreme environmental conditions. The evolutionary history of dromedary and Bactrian camels traces back to the middle Eocene (around 40 million years ago, mya), when the ancestors of Camelus emerged on the North American continent. While the genetic status of the two domestic species has long been established, the wild two-humped camel has only recently been recognized as a separate species, Camelus ferus, based on molecular genetic data. The demographic history established from genome drafts of Old World camels shows the independent development of the three species over the last 100,000 years with severe bottlenecks occurring during the last glacial period and in the recent past. Ongoing studies involve the immune system, relevant production traits, and the global population structure and domestication of Old World camels. Based on the now available whole genome drafts, specific metabolic pathways have been described shedding new light on the camels' ability to adapt to desert environments. These new data will also be at the origin for genome-wide association studies to link economically relevant phenotypes to genotypes and to conserve the diverse genetic resources in Old World camelids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据