4.2 Article

Nephrotoxicity of Kalach 360 SL: biochemical and histopathological findings

期刊

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 685-691

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2016.1230918

关键词

Herbicide; Kalach; female Wistar rats; chronic effects; nephrotoxicity; urine parameters; nephrose; necrotic epithelial cells

资金

  1. research unit of histology/embryology via Sfax University
  2. Faculty of Medicine [99/UR/08-60]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kalach 360 SL (KL) is a commercial herbicide which contains 360 g/l of glyphosate used in both agricultural and urban areas throughout the world including Tunisia. We aimed to evaluate the effects of KL on rats' renal system. Female Wistar rats were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 6) received a standard diet and served as control, groups 2 and 3 (n = 12 each) received 0.07ml (D1: 126mg/kg), and 0.175 ml (D2: 315mg/kg) of KL, respectively, for 60 d. The chronic exposure to KL induced a significant increase in plasma creatinine, urea, and uric acid levels. Creatinine clearance decreased in KLtreated groups, compared with controls. Several urine parameters, such as urine-specific gravity and urine osmolality, significantly decreased, while dieresis and urinary Na/K+ratio increased in KL-treated groups. These findings suggested a distal tubular damage caused by tubular necrosis. Moreover, the chronic exposure to KL induced an increase in lipid peroxidation (LPO) and a decrease in antioxidant status, enzymatic activities (superoxide dismutase and catalase) and non-enzymatic levels (vitamin C), which led to an oxidative stress. Histopathological studies showed a peritubular inflammatory reaction, nephrose, fragmented glomeruli, necrotic epithelial cells, and tubular dilatation. These results could have significant health implications for animal and human populations. Further data are necessary to investigate the potential consequences of chronic dose exposure during life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据