4.4 Article

The long-term impact of biliopancreatic diversion on glycemic control in the severely obese with type 2 diabetes mellitus in relation to preoperative duration of diabetes

期刊

SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 345-349

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.012

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; Bariatric surgery; Biliopancreatic diversion; Diabetes resolution; Retrospective study; Very long term results

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be effective in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Objective: Evaluate the long-term efficacy of biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) for the treatment of T2DM depending on the preoperative duration of T2DM. Setting: University Hospital. Methods: Retrospective analysis investigating 2 subsets of severely obese patients who had undergone BPD from 1984 to 1995. The first included 52 patients with a preoperative T2DM duration of similar to 1 year (SD group -49 on oral agents and 3 on insulin), and the second included 68 patients who had been diabetic for > 5 years before BPD (LD group -52 on oral agents and 16 on insulin). Postoperatively, T2DM was regarded as in remission when fasting serum glucose (FSG) was lower than 100 mg/dL on regular diet and without antidiabetic therapy. Results: In the SD patients, the number of individuals without T2DM remission were lower both at 5-10 (0/31, 0% of patients, versus 8/54, 15% of patients, p < .04) and at > 15 years (1/28, 3% of patients, versus 10/41, 24% of patients, p < .0012). Furthermore, after BPD, the number of patients with dyslipidemia strongly reduced (p < .001) in both groups, values at 5-10 years remaining very similar to those observed at > 15 years. Conclusion: These results indicate that severely obese patients with longer T2DM duration have a worse metabolic outcome maintained at long and very long term following BPD. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据