期刊
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 1-10出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.05.001
关键词
Expert judgment; Graphical method; Inductive reasoning; Measurement; Statistical method; Visual cognition
This article discusses methods of inductive inferences that are methods of visualizations designed in such a way that the eye can be employed as a reliable tool for judgment. The term eye is used as a stand-in for visual cognition and perceptual processing. In this paper meaningfulness has a particular meaning, namely accuracy, which is closeness to truth. Accuracy consists of precision and unbiasedness. Precision is dealt with by statistical methods, but for unbiasedness one needs expert judgment. The common view at the beginning of the twentieth century was to make the most efficient use of this kind of judgment by representing the data in shapes and forms in such a way that the eye can function as a reliable judge to reduce bias. The need for judgment of the eye is even more necessary when the background conditions of the observations are heterogeneous. Statistical procedures require a certain minimal level of homogeneity, but the eye does not. The eye is an adequate tool for assessing topological similarities when, due to heterogeneity of the data, metric assessment is not possible. In fact, graphical assessments precedes measurement, or to put it more forcefully, the graphic method is a necessary prerequisite for measurement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据