4.6 Article

Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials

期刊

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 1543-1562

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280216648357

关键词

Cluster randomised trials; missing outcome data; covariate dependent missingness; multiple imputation; complete records analysis

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), UK via Bloomsbury Doctoral Training Centre [ES/J5000021/1]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/L011964/1]
  3. MRC [MR/K02180X/1]
  4. MRC [MR/K02180X/1, MR/L011964/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [1360297] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K02180X/1, MR/L011964/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attrition is a common occurrence in cluster randomised trials which leads to missing outcome data. Two approaches for analysing such trials are cluster-level analysis and individual-level analysis. This paper compares the performance of unadjusted cluster-level analysis, baseline covariate adjusted cluster-level analysis and linear mixed model analysis, under baseline covariate dependent missingness in continuous outcomes, in terms of bias, average estimated standard error and coverage probability. The methods of complete records analysis and multiple imputation are used to handle the missing outcome data. We considered four scenarios, with the missingness mechanism and baseline covariate effect on outcome either the same or different between intervention groups. We show that both unadjusted cluster-level analysis and baseline covariate adjusted cluster-level analysis give unbiased estimates of the intervention effect only if both intervention groups have the same missingness mechanisms and there is no interaction between baseline covariate and intervention group. Linear mixed model and multiple imputation give unbiased estimates under all four considered scenarios, provided that an interaction of intervention and baseline covariate is included in the model when appropriate. Cluster mean imputation has been proposed as a valid approach for handling missing outcomes in cluster randomised trials. We show that cluster mean imputation only gives unbiased estimates when missingness mechanism is the same between the intervention groups and there is no interaction between baseline covariate and intervention group. Multiple imputation shows overcoverage for small number of clusters in each intervention group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Estimating cluster-level local average treatment effects in cluster randomised trials with non-adherence

Schadrac C. Agbla, Bianca De Stavola, Karla DiazOrdaz

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Bootstrap inference for multiple imputation under uncongeniality and misspecification

Jonathan W. Bartlett, Rachael A. Hughes

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Letter Mathematical & Computational Biology

The Hazards of Period Specific and Weighted Hazard Ratios

Jonathan W. Bartlett, Tim P. Morris, Mats J. Stensrud, Rhian M. Daniel, Stijn K. Vansteelandt, Carl-Fredrik Burman

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Article Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications

Robust Inference for Mediated Effects in Partially Linear Models

Oliver Hines, Stijn Vansteelandt, Karla Diaz-Ordaz

Summary: In this study, G-estimators were proposed for direct and indirect effects under partially linear mean models, with consistent asymptotic normality demonstrated for indirect effects when models are correctly specified. A new score testing framework was constructed using generalized method of moments (GMM) results, showing better performance in terms of power and small sample sizes compared to traditional tests in a partially linear setting.

PSYCHOMETRIKA (2021)

Article Statistics & Probability

Maximum Likelihood Multiple Imputation: Faster Imputations and Consistent Standard Errors Without Posterior Draws

Paul T. von Hippel, Jonathan W. Bartlett

Summary: Multiple imputation is a method for repairing and analyzing data with missing values by replacing them with random values drawn from an imputation model. The most popular form is posterior draw multiple imputation (PDMI) and maximum likelihood multiple imputation (MLMI), with MLMI being faster and slightly more efficient. Estimating the standard errors of MLMI point estimates was a past barrier, which has been addressed by implementing three consistent standard error formulas.

STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Reference-Based Multiple Imputation-What is the Right Variance and How to Estimate It

Jonathan W. Bartlett

Summary: Reference-based multiple imputation methods are widely used for handling missing data in randomized clinical trials. This article reviews the debate on whether Rubin's variance estimator or alternative (smaller) variance estimators targeting the repeated sampling variance are more appropriate. It suggests that the repeated sampling variance is more appropriate and proposes a recent proposal for combining bootstrapping with multiple imputation as a widely applicable general solution.

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Recalibrating SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Lateral Flow Test Relative Sensitivity from Validation Studies to Absolute Sensitivity for Indicating Individuals Shedding Transmissible Virus

Irene Petersen, Alexander Crozier, Iain Buchan, Michael J. Mina, Jonathan W. Bartlett

Summary: The testing for SARS-CoV-2 internationally has largely been focused on COVID-19 diagnosis through PCR tests among symptomatic individuals, but there has been a recent shift towards using LFT for testing asymptomatic individuals in public health programs. By recalibrating relative performance statistics, the sensitivity of LFT for detecting individuals shedding SARS-CoV-2 antigens can be significantly improved.

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Standard and reference-based conditional mean imputation

Marcel Wolbers, Alessandro Noci, Paul Delmar, Craig Gower-Page, Sean Yiu, Jonathan W. Bartlett

Summary: This article introduces an alternative imputation method for longitudinal outcomes in clinical trials. The proposed method, based on deterministic conditional mean imputation and jackknife inference, can be used for imputation under a missing-at-random assumption and is not affected by random sampling.

PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2022)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Estimands and their Estimators for Clinical Trials Impacted by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report from the NISS Ingram Olkin Forum Series on Unplanned Clinical Trial Disruptions

Kelly Van Lancker, Sergey Tarima, Jonathan Bartlett, Madeline Bauer, Bharani Bharani-Dharan, Frank Bretz, Nancy Flournoy, Hege Michiels, Camila Olarte Parra, James L. Rosenberger, Suzie Cro

Summary: This article discusses how to address trial disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and proposes strategies and methods to deal with them. By introducing the concepts of estimands and sensitivity analyses, the impact of pandemic-related interferences on trial results can be better understood, and considerations for future trial designs can be provided.

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2022)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods

Camila Olarte Parra, Rhian M. Daniel, Jonathan W. Bartlett

Summary: This article focuses on the hypothetical strategy proposed in ICH E9 addendum for handling intercurrent events. It discusses the estimation of treatment effect under the hypothetical scenario where intercurrent events are prevented using causal inference and missing data methods. The article establishes links between certain causal inference estimators and missing data estimators, which can be helpful for researchers familiar with one set of methods but not the other.

STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2023)

Editorial Material Biology

Discussion on: Instrumented difference-in-differences, by Ting Ye, Ashkan Ertefaie, James Flory, Sean Hennessy and Dylan S. Small

Karla DiazOrdaz

Summary: This article discusses the assumptions necessary for identifying average treatment effects and local average treatment effects in instrumented difference-in-differences (IDID). It also explores the potential trade-offs between the assumptions of standard instrumental variable (IV) methods and those needed for the proposed IDID method in both one- and two-sample settings. Furthermore, the interpretation of estimands identified under the assumption of monotonicity is discussed.

BIOMETRICS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates

Rosaleen Peggy Cornish, Jonathan William Bartlett, John Macleod, Kate Tilling

Summary: This study investigated the bias in exposure odds ratio (OR) estimation when using complete case logistic regression with a binary outcome that depends on a continuous outcome. The inclusion of a misclassified form of the incomplete outcome as an auxiliary variable in multiple imputation was also examined for bias reduction. The results showed that there was bias in the exposure OR, especially when the association between the continuous outcome and missingness was strong. The inclusion of the auxiliary variable helped reduce bias, particularly when it had high sensitivity and specificity.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods

Multiple imputation of partially observed covariates in discrete-time survival analysis

Anna-Carolina Haensch, Jonathan Bartlett, Bernd Weiss

Summary: Discrete-time survival analysis (DTSA) models are popular in social sciences for modeling events. However, missing data in covariates poses challenges in the analysis of DTSA. Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular approach to address these challenges, but there is little guidance on incorporating observed outcome information into the imputation models in DTSA. This study explores and compares different existing approaches, and proposes an extended method.

SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2022)

Letter Mathematical & Computational Biology

Comment on Oberman & Vink: Should we fix or simulate the complete data in simulation studies evaluating missing data methods?

Tim P. Morris, Ian R. White, Suzie Cro, Jonathan W. Bartlett, James R. Carpenter, Tra My Pham

Summary: For simulation studies evaluating methods of handling missing data, generating partially observed data by fixing complete data and simulating missingness indicators repeatedly is rarely appropriate.

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

They built this city-construction workers injured in Delhi, India: cross-sectional analysis of First Information Reports of the Delhi Police 2016-2018

Phil Edwards, Sajjan Yadav, Jonathan Bartlett, John Porter

Summary: This study examines the epidemiology of construction site injuries in Delhi, India using police records. The findings reveal that construction workers are at higher risk of injuries, particularly in developing countries. Female construction workers are also at significant risk, and children accompanying their parents at work are also in danger. Building collapses and electrical shocks are the main hazards faced by construction workers. Introducing and enforcing occupational safety, health, and working conditions laws are necessary to control this injury burden.

INJURY EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

暂无数据