4.6 Article

Silver nanoparticle plasmonic effects on hole-transport material-free mesoporous heterojunction perovskite solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 475-483

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.023

关键词

Silver nanoparticles; Perovskite solar cells; Plasmonic effects; Hole-blocking layer

资金

  1. Yazd regional branch of the Ministry of Energy
  2. Center of Excellence on the Structure and Properties of Matter, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  3. Research Institute of Science and High Technology
  4. Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Localized surface plasmon resonance excitation of noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) under light illumination can be incorporated to effectively improve light-harvesting devices. The present study aims at silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) plasmonic effects on the photovoltaic characteristics of mesoporous hetrojunction perovskite solar cells. Ag NPs were embedded into a compact TiO2 layer, which commonly acts as hole blocking layer in mesoporous perovskite solar cells. An optimum concentration of Ag NPs loaded on colt pact TiO2:Ag-NPs films of hole-transport material-free (HTM-free(perovskite solar cells leads to more than 30% enhancement in power conversion efficiency of the fabricated cells compared with what Ag nanoparticle-free samples can do. The improved performance can be attributed to the scattering effect from the incorporated Ag-NPs, which effectively extends the optical pathway of incident light that increases the photon absorption of the photoactive perovskite layer. In addition to the modulated optical properties of HTM-free perovskite solar cells, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements show that electron transport time at the interfacial layer of TiO2 and the photovoltaic perovskite layer decreases as a result of frequency response improvement in the photoanode interface. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据