4.4 Article

Nonlinear effects of general relativity from multiscale structure

期刊

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
卷 32, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/21/215013

关键词

backreaction; mathematical cosmology; structure of the Universe; nonlinearity of general relativity

资金

  1. project 'The role of small-scale inhomogeneities in general relativity and cosmology' [HOMING PLUS/2012-5/4]
  2. European Union from the Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When do the nonlinear effects of general relativity matter in astrophysical situations? They are obviously relevant for very compact sources of the gravitational field, such as neutron stars or black holes. In this paper I discuss another, less obvious situation, in which large relativistic effects may arise due to a complicated, multiscale structure of the matter distribution. I present an exact solution with an inhomogeneous energy density distribution in the form of a hierarchy of nested voids and overdensities of various sizes, extending from the homogeneity scale down to arbitrary small scales. I show that although each of the voids and overdensities seems to be very weakly relativistic, and thus easy to describe using the linearized general relativity, the solution taken as a whole lies in fact in the nonlinear regime. Its nonlinear properties are most easily seen when we compare the ADM mass of the solution and the integral of the local mass density: the difference between them, i.e. the relativistic mass deficit, can be significant provided that the inhomogeneities extend to sufficiently small scales. The non-additivity of masses implies a large backreaction effect, i.e. significant discrepancy between the averaged, large-scale effective stress-energy tensor and the naive average of the local energy density. I show that this is a general relativistic effect arising due to the inhomogeneous, multiscale structure. I also discuss the relevance of the results in cosmology and relativistic astrophysics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据