4.4 Article

A paucity of bulk entangling surfaces: AdS wormholes with de Sitter interiors

期刊

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/6/065011

关键词

AdS/CFT; entanglement entropy; conformal field theory; black holes

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY11-25915]
  2. FQXi grant [FRP3-1338]
  3. University of California
  4. STFC [ST/L00044X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00044X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Physics [1205500] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study and construct spacetimes, dubbed planar AdS-dS-wormholes, satisfying the null energy condition and having two asymptotically AdS boundaries connected through a (non-traversable) inflating wormhole. As for other wormholes, it is natural to expect dual descriptions in terms of two disconnected conformal field theories (CFTs) in appropriate entangled states. But for our cases, certain expected bulk entangling surfaces used by the Hubeny-Rangamani-Takayanagi (HRT) prescription to compute CFT entropy do not exist. In particular, no real codimension-2 extremal surface can run from one end of the wormhole to the other. According to HRT, the mutual information between any two finite-sized subregions (one in each CFT) must then vanish at leading order in large N-though the leading-order mutual information per unit area between the two CFTs taken as wholes may be nonzero. Some planar AdS-dS-wormholes also fail to have plane-symmetric surfaces that would compute the total entropy of either CFT. We suggest this to remain true of less-symmetric surfaces so that the HRT entropy is ill-defined and some modified prescription is required. It may be possible to simply extend HRT or the closely-related maximin construction by a limiting procedure, though complex extremal surfaces could also play an important role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据