4.6 Article

Performance improvement scheme of multifocus image fusion derived by difference images

期刊

SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 474-493

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.015

关键词

Multifocus image fusion; Difference image; Updating mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61302041, 61562053, 61363043]
  2. Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department [2013FD011]
  3. Major Project of Education Department of Yunnan Province [2014Z022]
  4. Talent Development Project of Kunming University of Science and Technology [KKSY201403116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multiscale transform (MST)-based multifocus image fusion, the fusion rules of different subbands are a significant factor that affects the fusion performance. However, dependence only on new fusion rule will see no significant performance gain for a MST-based method. To address this problem, this paper proposes two novel multifocus image fusion techniques based on multi-scale and multi-direction neighbor distance (MMND), in which the improvements of the fusion performance are respectively achieved by two new developed updating schemes. These two schemes are constructed according to the fact that the difference between a low quality fused result and the source image in the focused region is sharper than those generated by a high quality fused result. Based on this fact, the pixels of the source images are classified into three types in the updating mechanism, namely, pixels of focused significant regions, pixels of smooth regions, pixels of transition area between the focused and defocused regions. According to the categories of source images pixels, we can update the fused result produced by the MMND method in spatial and the MMND domain. Extensive experimental results validate that the proposed two fusion schemes can achieve better results than some state-of-the art algorithms. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据