4.6 Article

Assessing Walking Strategies Using Insole Pressure Sensors for Stroke Survivors

期刊

SENSORS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s16101631

关键词

insole pressure sensors; stroke survivals; machine learning; rehabilitation; walking strategies

资金

  1. HERMES-SMART DRIVER project - Spanish MINECO [TIN2013-46801-C4-2-R]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion Cultura y Deporte [PRX15/00036]
  3. NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber [39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insole pressure sensors capture the different forces exercised over the different parts of the sole when performing tasks standing up such as walking. Using data analysis and machine learning techniques, common patterns and strategies from different users to achieve different tasks can be automatically extracted. In this paper, we present the results obtained for the automatic detection of different strategies used by stroke survivors when walking as integrated into an Information Communication Technology (ICT) enhanced Personalised Self-Management Rehabilitation System (PSMrS) for stroke rehabilitation. Fourteen stroke survivors and 10 healthy controls have participated in the experiment by walking six times a distance from chair to chair of approximately 10 m long. The Rivermead Mobility Index was used to assess the functional ability of each individual in the stroke survivor group. Several walking strategies are studied based on data gathered from insole pressure sensors and patterns found in stroke survivor patients are compared with average patterns found in healthy control users. A mechanism to automatically estimate a mobility index based on the similarity of the pressure patterns to a stereotyped stride is also used. Both data gathered from stroke survivors and healthy controls are used to evaluate the proposed mechanisms. The output of trained algorithms is applied to the PSMrS system to provide feedback on gait quality enabling stroke survivors to self-manage their rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据