4.5 Review

The decidua-the maternal bed embracing the embryo-maintains the pregnancy

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 635-649

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-016-0574-0

关键词

Decidua; Endometrium; Pregnancy; Infertility; Preeclampsia; Vascular remodeling

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [SROP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0053, SROP-4.2.2.D-15/1/KONV-2015-0004, PTE AOK-KA 2015-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decidua has been known as maternal uterine tissue, which plays essential roles in protecting the embryo from being attacked by maternal immune cells and provides nutritional support for the developing embryo prior to placenta formation. However, there are questions that still remain to be answered: (1) How does the decidua supply nutrition and provide a physical scaffold for the growing embryo, before placental vascular connection is established? (2) How is the balance between preventing an anti-embryo immune response and protecting both embryo and mother from infections established? To understand basic personas in decidual tissues, we review the structure of the decidua composed of terminally differentiated uterine stromal cells, blood vessels, and a number of repertoire of uterine local immune cells, including the well-known uterine natural killer (uNK) cells and recently discovered innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Decidual macrophages and uterine dendritic cells (DCs) are supposed to modulate adaptive immunity via balancing cytokines and promoting generation of regulatory T (T-reg) cells. During decidualization, vascular and tissue remodeling in the uterus provide nutritional and physical support for the developing embryo. Secretion of various cytokines and chemokines from both the embryo and the decidual cells activates multiple signaling network between the mother and the embryo upon implantation. Defects in the decidual development during early pregnancy result in loss of pregnancy or complications in later gestational stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据