4.5 Article

Effect of Corticosteroid Therapy on Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 79, 期 7, 页码 1593-1600

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1275

关键词

Cardiac sarcoidosis; Corticosteroid; Left ventricular function; Long-term prognosis

资金

  1. Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25860630]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461119, 25860630] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cardiac involvement is the worst prognostic determinant in patients with sarcoidosis, but the long-term prognostic significance of corticosteroid therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) remains unclear. Methods and Results: We examined 83 consecutive patients diagnosed with CS. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of corticosteroid therapy at diagnosis. Patients with corticosteroid therapy had lower age and higher rate of positive findings in the myocardium on gallium scintigraphy (Ga) at diagnosis than those without. LVEF, biomarkers, and use of cardiovascular medication were similar between the 2 groups. During the follow-up (7.6 +/- 4.4 years), corticosteroid therapy was associated with fewer long-term adverse events (overall, P=0.005; cardiac death, P=0.92; symptomatic arrhythmias, P=0.89; heart failure admission, P<0.0001) and a greater % increase in LVEF than those without (7.9 +/- 36.3% vs. -16.7 +/- 34.8%, P=0.03). On Cox proportional hazards modeling, corticosteroid therapy (HR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20-0.89) was an independent determinant of long-term adverse event-free survival, but age, sex, LVEF, and Ga findings were not. Conclusions: Corticosteroid therapy might have a beneficial effect on long-term clinical outcome in CS patients, particularly by reduction of heart failure admission and retarding the progression of LV systolic dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据