4.7 Article

Impact of WRF model PBL schemes on air quality simulations over Catalonia, Spain

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 572, 期 -, 页码 98-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.167

关键词

Atmospheric modelling; Weather research and forecasting (WRF) model; Remote sensing; Air quality; Lidar

资金

  1. European Union [289923]
  2. MareNostrum supercomputer at the Barcelona Supercomputing Centre, under grant of Severo Ochoa program [SEV-2011-00067, CGL2013-46736-R]
  3. Spanish Government. Special thanks to Francesc Rocadenbosch
  4. UPC Remote Sensing Laboratory for use of the extended Kalman filter technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we analyze the impact of four planetary boundary-layer (PBL) parametrization schemes from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) numerical weather prediction model on simulations of meteorological variables and predicted pollutant concentrations from an air quality forecast system (AQFS). The current setup of the Spanish operational AQFS, CALIOPE, is composed of the WRF-ARW V3.5.1 meteorological model tied to the Yonsei University (YSU) PBL scheme, HERMES v2 emissions model, CMAQ V5.0.2 chemical transport model, and dust outputs from BSC-DREAM8bv2. We test the performance of the YSU scheme against the Assymetric Convective Model Version 2 (ACM2), Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ), and Bougeault-Lacarrere (BouLac) schemes. The one-day diagnostic case study is selected to represent the most frequent synoptic condition in the northeast Iberian Peninsula during spring 2015; regional recirculations. It is shown that the ACM2 PBL scheme performs well with daytime PBL height, as validated against estimates retrieved using a micro-pulse lidar system (mean bias = -0.11 km). In turn, the BouLac scheme showed WRF-simulated air and dew point temperature closer to METAR surface meteorological observations. Results are more ambiguous when simulated pollutant concentrations from CMAQ are validated against network urban, suburban, and rural background stations. The ACM2 scheme showed the lowest mean bias (-0.96 mu g m(-3)) with respect to surface ozone at urban stations, while the YSU scheme performed best with simulated nitrogen dioxide (- 6.48 mu g m(-3)). The poorest results were with simulated particulate matter, with similar results found with all schemes tested. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据