4.7 Article

Hydrological conditions regulate dissolved organic matter quality in an intermittent headwater stream. From drought to storm analysis

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 1358-1369

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.060

关键词

Flood; Water scarcity; Mediterranean stream; Time series; Spectroscopic properties; Hysteresis

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC) [CGL2011-30151-C02, CGL2014-5876-C3-R]
  2. European Community [603629-ENV-2013-6.2.1 GLOBAQUA]
  3. University of Barcelona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Storms and droughts are an essential driver for the dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration in headwater streams. However, the relationship between DOM quality and discharge (Q) has not been addressed in depth and the impact of other hydro-climatic or biogeochetnical drivers has not been explored. In this study DOM quality variability was explored at seasonal and storm event scales during an intensive 2.5-year-long sampling in a Mediterranean stream characterized by a severe summer drought. DOM quality was described in terms of absorbance and fluorescence properties. Most of the DOM properties were strongly related to discharge revealing the input of allochthonous, degraded, aromatic, humic and increased-molecular-size DOM under high flow conditions. However, these relationships disappeared or reversed during drying and rewetting periods. Each DOM response at the storm event scale (DOM-Qhysteresis) was outlined with two descriptors that summarised its trend (dilution/flushing/chemostasis) and shape (linear/nonlinear response). Multiple linear regression and commonality analysis showed that, in addition to the magnitude of storm episodes, antecedent hydrological conditions, namely pre-event basal flow and the magnitude of the previous storm event, played a significant role in regulating the trends and shapes of DOM-Q hysteresis. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据