4.8 Article

Nematicity in stripe-ordered cuprates probed via resonant x-ray scattering

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 351, 期 6273, 页码 576-578

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1824

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  2. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Canada Research Chair Program
  5. CFI
  6. NSERC
  7. National Research Council Canada
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  9. Government of Saskatchewan
  10. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  11. University of Saskatchewan
  12. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  13. Canada Council for the Arts and the Perimeter Institute (PI) for Theoretical Physics
  14. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  15. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  16. German Science Foundation (DFG) through the Emmy-Noether [GE1647/2-1]
  17. German Science Foundation (DFG) through the D-A-CH program [GE 1647/3-1]
  18. French Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In underdoped cuprate superconductors, a rich competition occurs between superconductivity and charge density wave (CDW) order. Whether rotational symmetry-breaking (nematicity) occurs intrinsically and generically or as a consequence of other orders is under debate. Here, we employ resonant x-ray scattering in stripe-ordered superconductors (La,M)(2)CuO4 to probe the relationship between electronic nematicity of the Cu 3d orbitals, structure of the (La,M)(2)O-2 layers, and CDW order. We find distinct temperature dependences for the structure of the (La,M)(2)O-2 layers and the electronic nematicity of the CuO2 planes, with only the latter being enhanced by the onset of CDW order. These results identify electronic nematicity as an order parameter that is distinct from a purely structural order parameter in underdoped striped cuprates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据