4.5 Article

Defining the purity of exosomes required for diagnostic profiling of small RNA suitable for biomarker discovery

期刊

RNA BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 245-258

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1270005

关键词

Biomarkers; exosomes; miRNA; small RNA

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FT100100560]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [628946]
  3. Belberry Indigenous Health Fellowships (MDHS, The University of Melbourne)
  4. Melbourne International Research Scholarship
  5. Australian Research Council [FT100100560] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), including microRNAs (miRNA), enclosed in exosomes are being utilised for biomarker discovery in disease. Two common exosome isolation methods involve differential ultracentrifugation or differential ultracentrifugation coupled with Optiprep gradient fractionation. Generally, the incorporation of an Optiprep gradient provides better separation and increased purity of exosomes. The question of whether increased purity of exosomes is required for small ncRNA profiling, particularly in diagnostic and biomarker purposes, has not been addressed and highly debated. Utilizing an established neuronal cell system, we used next-generation sequencing to comprehensively profile ncRNA in cells and exosomes isolated by these 2 isolation methods. By comparing ncRNA content in exosomes from these two methods, we found that exosomes from both isolation methods were enriched with miRNAs and contained a diverse range of rRNA, small nuclear RNA, small nucleolar RNA and piwi-interacting RNA as compared with their cellular counterparts. Additionally, tRNA fragments (30-55 nucleotides in length) were identified in exosomes and may act as potential modulators for repressing protein translation. Overall, the outcome of this study confirms that ultracentrifugation-based method as a feasible approach to identify ncRNA biomarkers in exosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据