4.3 Article

Systematics and evolutionary significance of some new cryptospores from the Cambrian of eastern Tennessee, USA

期刊

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 28-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.10.006

关键词

Laurentia; Palynology; Origin of land plants; Rogersville Shale; Successive meiosis

资金

  1. NSF [EAR-0106790]
  2. Petroleum Research Fund of the American Chemical Society [46740-B8]
  3. National Geographic Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The highly bioturbated mudstones of the uppermost Rome Formation and the Conasauga Group in eastern Tennessee contain an extensive palynoflora that consists primarily of nonmarine, spore-like microfossils, which are treated systematically as cryptospores because they present characters that are consistent with a charophytic origin. The following new taxa are proposed: Adinosporus voluminosus, Adinosporus bullatus, Adinosporus geminus, Spissuspora Iaevigata, and Vidalgea maculates The lamellated wall ultrastructure of some of these cryptospores appears to be homologous to extant, crown group sphaerocarpalean liverworts and to the more basal genus, Haplomitrium. There is direct evidence that some of these cryptospores developed via endosporogenesis-entirely within the spore mother cell wall. The topology of enclosed spores indicates that the meiotic production of spore dyads represents the functional spore end -members, but the diaspore itself appears to be a spore packet conesponding to the contents of each original spore mother cell. Aeroterrestrial charophytes of this time period underwent sporogenesis via successive meiosis rather than simultaneous meiosis. Overall, these remains are consistent with Bower's antithetic origin of the plant sporophyte because they present a picture of extensive and varied spore development (i.e. sporogenesis) well in advance of the occurrence of vegetative sporophytes in the fossil record. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据