4.7 Article

Turbulent kinetic energy estimates from profiling wind LiDAR measurements and their potential for wind energy applications

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 898-910

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.014

关键词

LiDAR; Turbulence; Wind turbine wakes

资金

  1. Theoretical Meteorology Group at the University of Vienna
  2. Norwegian Center for Offshore Wind Energy (NORCOWE) - Research Council of Norway (RCN) [193821]
  3. RCN [277770]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study shows that turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) estimates, derived from static LiDARs in Doppler Beam Swing (DBS) mode, permit a qualitative and quantitative characterization and analysis of turbulent structures as wind turbine wakes, and convective or shear generated eddies in the lower atmospheric boundary layer. The analysed data, collected by a WINDCUBE (TM) v1 in a wind park in Austria, is compared to WINDCUBE (TM) v1 and sonic data from the WINd Turbine Wake EXperiment Wieringermeer (WINT-WEX-W). Although turbulence measurements with a WINDCLJBE (TM) v1 are limited to a specific length scale, processed measurements above this threshold are in a good agreement with sonic anemometer data. In contrast to the commonly used turbulence intensity, the calculation of TKE not only provides an appropriate measure of turbulence intensities but also gives an insight into its origin. The processed data show typical wake characteristics, as flow decelerations, turbulence enhancement and wake rotation. By comparing these turbulence characteristics to other turbulent structures in the atmospheric boundary layer, we found that convection driven eddies in the surface layer have similar turbulence characteristics as turbine wakes, which makes convective weather situations relevant for wind turbine fatigue considerations. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据