4.7 Article

Optimization of Fenton process using response surface methodology and analytic hierarchy process for landfill leachate treatment

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 150-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.019

关键词

Leachate treatment; Fenton process; Response surface methodology; Analytic hierarchy process; Iron sludge reuse; Advance oxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Typically, to treat landfill leachate, biological techniques alone are not sufficient. In this study, Fenton process was found to be effective as a pretreatment method. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to select the favorable catalyst between FeSO4 and FeCl2 when three criteria, namely, (i) COD removal, (ii) sludge to iron ratio, and (iii) risk were considered. Meanwhile, response surface methodology was applied to model and optimize three target responses, (i) COD removal, (ii) sludge to iron ratio, and (iii) organic removal to sludge ratio. The effective variables included pH, [H2O2]/[Fe(2+)1] Fe2+ dosage and reaction time. In addition, to minimize the danger, generated sludge was reused in the Fenton process. According to AHP sensitivity analysis results, priority percentage for FeC12 and FeSO4 were 64% and 36%, respectively. Additionally, according to the statistical analysis, all suggested models were adequate (with R-2 of 0.9171-0.9617). The optimum condition was found to be pH = 6, [H2O2]/[Fe2+] = 20 mole ratio, [Fe2+]= 170 mM, and reaction time =105 min. Results showed that [H2O2]/[Fe2+] and [Fe2+] are significant for COD removal while pH and [H2O2]/[Fe2+] were important factors for sludge to iron ratio (SIR) and organic removal to sludge ratio (ORSR), respectively. Meanwhile, when iron sludge was reused as catalyst, the results were acceptable even after five times regeneration. (C) 2016 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据