4.8 Article

Site-specific genome editing for correction of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1512028113

关键词

CRISPR/Cas; TALENs; epidermolysis bullosa; gene editing; dominant negative effect

资金

  1. Skin Disease Research Center in the Department of Dermatology, Columbia University (National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) [P30AR44535]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H05999]
  3. New York State Stem Cell Science program [SDH C024321]
  4. Helmsley Trust
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05999] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome editing with engineered site-specific endonucleases involves nonhomologous end-joining, leading to reading frame disruption. The approach is applicable to dominant negative disorders, which can be treated simply by knocking out the mutant allele, while leaving the normal allele intact. We applied this strategy to dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB), which is caused by a dominant negative mutation in the COL7A1 gene encoding type VII collagen (COL7). We performed genome editing with TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 targeting the mutation, c.8068_8084delinsGA. We then cotransfected Cas9 and guide RNA expression vectors expressed with GFP and DsRed, respectively, into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from DDEB fibroblasts. After sorting, 90% of the iPSCs were edited, and we selected four gene-edited iPSC lines for further study. These iPSCs were differentiated into keratinocytes and fibroblasts secreting COL7. RT-PCR and Western blot analyses revealed gene-edited COL7 with frameshift mutations degraded at the protein level. In addition, we confirmed that the gene-edited truncated COL7 could neither associate with normal COL7 nor undergo triple helix formation. Our data establish the feasibility of mutation site-specific genome editing in dominant negative disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据