4.8 Article

Blocking rapid ice crystal growth through nonbasal plane adsorption of antifreeze proteins

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524109113

关键词

antifreeze protein; thermal hysteresis; ice recrystallization inhibition

资金

  1. NWO [700.10.406]
  2. European Union [293788, ERC-2014-StG, 635928]
  3. European Commission through Marie Curie fellowship
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1142158] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [635928] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are a unique class of proteins that bind to growing ice crystal surfaces and arrest further ice growth. AFPs have gained a large interest for their use in antifreeze formulations for water-based materials, such as foods, waterborne paints, and organ transplants. Instead of commonly used colligative antifreezes such as salts and alcohols, the advantage of using AFPs as an additive is that they do not alter the physicochemical properties of the water-based material. Here, we report the first comprehensive evaluation of thermal hysteresis (TH) and ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI) activity of all major classes of AFPs using cryoscopy, sonocrystallization, and recrystallization assays. The results show that TH activities determined by cryoscopy and sonocrystallization differ markedly, and that TH and IRI activities are not correlated. The absence of a distinct correlation in antifreeze activity points to a mechanistic difference in ice growth inhibition by the different classes of AFPs: blocking fast ice growth requires rapid nonbasal plane adsorption, whereas basal plane adsorption is only relevant at long annealing times and at small undercooling. These findings clearly demonstrate that biomimetic analogs of antifreeze (glyco) proteins should be tailored to the specific requirements of the targeted application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据