4.8 Article

Faster reproductive rates trade off against offspring growth in wild chimpanzees

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522168113

关键词

life history; growth; reproduction; primates; weaning

资金

  1. Leakey Foundation
  2. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [1355014, 0849380]
  4. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [R01AG049395]
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0849380, 1355014] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Life history theory predicts a trade-off between offspring quality and quantity. Among large-bodied mammals, prolonged lactation and infant dependence suggest particularly strong potential for a quality-quantity trade-off to exist. Humans are one of the only such species to have been examined, providing mixed evidence under a peculiar set of circumstances, including extensive nutritional provisioning by nonmothers and extrasomatic wealth transmission. Here, we examine trade-offs between reproductive rate and one aspect of offspring quality (body size) in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), a species with long periods of infant dependence and little direct provisioning. Juvenile lean body mass, estimated using urinary creatinine excretion, was positively associated with the interval to the next sibling's birth. These effects persisted into adolescence and were not moderated by maternal identity. Maternal depletion could not explain poor offspring growth, as older mothers had larger offspring, and low maternal energy balance during lactation predicted larger, not smaller, juvenile size. Instead, our data suggest that offspring growth suffers when mothers wean early to invest in new reproductive efforts. These findings indicate that chimpanzee mothers with the resources to do so prioritize production of new offspring over prolonged investment in current offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据