4.4 Article

Coordinative traction control of vehicles based on identification of the tyre-road friction coefficient

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954407015618041

关键词

Traction control; tyre-road friction coefficient estimation; sliding-mode observer; recursive least-squares method; coordinative control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51105169, 51205156, 51475206]
  2. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Projects [20140204010GX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traction control, which can be performed by different types of chassis control system, plays an important role in vehicle motion control. Since the propulsive force is actually produced by the friction between the tyre and road, information on the tyre-road friction is crucial for traction control. In this paper, a robust and effective tyre-road friction coefficient identification algorithm for straight acceleration is proposed, and a coordinative traction control method is designed by integrated usage of gear shifting control, engine control and braking control. For different driving conditions, the tyre forces were observed by a sliding-mode observer or calculated from the states of the vehicle directly, and the tyre-road friction coefficients were estimated by the recursive least-squares method or calculated from the linear characteristics between the friction coefficient and the slip ratio consequently. Based on the estimated tyre-road information, a practical and systematic coordinative traction control algorithm was designed to integrate shifting control, engine torque control and braking pressure control. Finally, the proposed methods are verified by both simulations and road tests. The results show that the estimation algorithms can identify the variation in the road conditions with considerable accuracy and response speed, and the controller successfully adjusted the slip ratios of the driving wheels in the stable region with good performances on different types of road.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据