4.5 Article

Green synthesis of polymer nanofibers and their composites as flame-retardant materials for polymer nanocomposites

期刊

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 1091-1097

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.3775

关键词

flammability; nanofibers; polymers; nanocomposites; thermal properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyaniline nanofibers and their composites with carbon nanotubes were developed as an effective flame-retardant material using a facile green method. Polyaniline nanofibers were used as a smart flame-retardant for acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymer. The polyaniline nanofibers were dispersed in polymer matrix forming well-dispersed polymer nanocomposites. Effect of polyaniline nanofiber mass ratio on the polymer nanocomposite properties was studied. Polyaniline nanofiber composites with carbon nanotubes were also dispersed in polymer matrix. The thermal stability and flammability properties of the polymer nanocomposites were investigated. The rate of burning of polymer nanocomposites achieved 82.5% reduction (7.32 mm/min) compared with virgin polymer (42.5 mm/min). The reduction in peak heat release rate and total heat release of the polymer nanocomposites containing nanofibers achieved 74 and 34%, respectively. Interestingly, the average mass loss rate was significantly reduced by 58% and the emission of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide gases were suppressed by 20 and 47%, respectively. The effect of polyaniline nanofibers composites on the flammability of polymer nanocomposites was also studied. Polyaniline nanofibers and their composites were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and transmission and scanning electron microscopy. The dispersion of polyaniline nanofibers in polymer nanocomposites was characterized using transmission electron microscopy. The different polymer nanocomposites were characterized using thermogravimetric analysis, UL94 flame chamber, and cone calorimeter tests. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据