4.3 Article

Trophic structure of shallow-water benthic communities in the sub-Antarctic Strait of Magellan

期刊

POLAR BIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 2281-2297

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-016-1895-0

关键词

Benthic communities; Functional guilds; Isotopic niche; Magellan Strait; Stable isotope; Subpolar; Trophic ecology

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD, Bonn, Germany) [A0882368]
  2. Comision Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONICYT, Santiago, Chile)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trophic structure is among the most fundamental characteristics of an ecosystem since it is a useful way to determine the main energy flow at the ecosystem level. In the Magellan Strait, the local spatial heterogeneity at the shallow-waters ecosystems may have a great variety of potential food sources; however, knowledge about their biological communities and their structure is still unclear. We examined the trophic structure of shallow-water-mixed bottom communities at two sites in the sub-Antarctic Magellan Strait based on carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen (delta N-15) stable isotope ratios. The benthic communities were composed of 46 species from 20 major taxa at Bahia Laredo (BL) and 55 species from 18 major taxa at Punta Santa Ana (PSA). Benthic macroalgae and organic matter associated with sediment are the major primary food sources at both sites. Although both sites are quite similar in their food sources and in their vertical trophic structure (>= three trophic levels), the food web structure varied distinctly. Functionally, predators and grazers dominated both communities, but top predators were shorebirds, carnivore anemones and predatory nemerteans at BL, and sea stars, shorebirds, crabs and fishes at PSA. The distinct differences in the trophic structure at BL and PSA highlight the important variability of delta N-15 at the base of the benthic food web, the role of local environmental conditions and community dynamics in structuring shallow-water communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据