4.6 Article

Meta-Analysis of EMT Datasets Reveals Different Types of EMT

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156839

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31422032, 31421004, 91519305]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2014A030308002]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Planning Project [2013B010404040]
  4. Guangzhou Health Care Collaborative Innovation Program [201508020250]
  5. Guangdong special support program [2014TQ01R157]
  6. National Science Foundation of United States [III 1117153]
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1149697] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a critical process during embryonic development, cancer progression and cell fate conversions, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been extensively studied over the last several decades. To further understand the nature of EMT, we performed meta-analysis of multiple microarray datasets to identify the related generic signature. In this study, 24 human and 17 mouse microarray datasets were integrated to identify conserved gene expression changes in different types of EMT. Our integrative analysis revealed that there is low agreement among the list of the identified signature genes and three other lists in previous studies. Since removing the datasets with weakly-induced EMT from the analysis did not significantly improve the overlapping in the signature-gene lists, we hypothesized the existence of different types of EMT. This hypothesis was further supported by the grouping of 74 human EMT-induction samples into five distinct clusters, and the identification of distinct pathways in these different clusters of EMT samples. The five clusters of EMT-induction samples also improves the understanding of the characteristics of different EMT types. Therefore, we concluded the existence of different types of EMT was the possible reason for its complex role in multiple biological processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据