4.6 Article

Diet and Macronutrient Optimization in Wild Ursids: A Comparison of Grizzly Bears with Sympatric and Allopatric Black Bears

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153702

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Park Service-Natural Resource Preservation Program
  2. Grand Teton National Park Foundation
  3. Charles Engelhard Foundation
  4. Earth Friends Wildlife Foundation
  5. Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee
  6. University of Wyoming-National Park Service Research Station
  7. John and Karin McQuillan
  8. Wildlife Society-Wyoming Chapter Memorial Bear Fund
  9. Grand Teton National Park
  10. U.S. Geological Survey
  11. Northern Rocky Mountains Science Center
  12. Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When fed ad libitum, ursids can maximize mass gain by selecting mixed diets wherein protein provides 17 +/- 4% of digestible energy, relative to carbohydrates or lipids. In the wild, this ability is likely constrained by seasonal food availability, limits of intake rate as body size increases, and competition. By visiting locations of 37 individuals during 274 bear-days, we documented foods consumed by grizzly (Ursus arctos) and black bears (Ursus americanus) in Grand Teton National Park during 2004-2006. Based on published nutritional data, we estimated foods and macronutrients as percentages of daily energy intake. Using principal components and cluster analyses, we identified 14 daily diet types. Only 4 diets, accounting for 21% of days, provided protein levels within the optimal range. Nine diets (75% of days) led to over-consumption of protein, and 1 diet (3% of days) led to under-consumption. Highest protein levels were associated with animal matter (i.e., insects, vertebrates), which accounted for 46-47% of daily energy for both species. As predicted: 1) daily diets dominated by high-energy vertebrates were positively associated with grizzly bears and mean percent protein intake was positively associated with bodymass; 2) diets dominated by low-protein fruits were positively associated with smaller-bodied black bears; and 3) mean protein was highest during spring, when high-energy plant foods were scarce, however it was also higher than optimal during summer and fall. Contrary to our prediction: 4) allopatric black bears did not exhibit food selection for high-energy foods similar to grizzly bears. Although optimal gain of body mass was typically constrained, bears usually opted for the energetically superior trade-off of consuming high-energy, high-protein foods. Given protein digestion efficiency similar to obligate carnivores, this choice likely supported mass gain, consistent with studies showing monthly increases in percent body fat among bears in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Ecology

Density dependence, whitebark pine, and vital rates of grizzly bears

Frank T. van Manen, Mark A. Haroldson, Daniel D. Bjornlie, Michael R. Ebinger, Daniel J. Thompson, Cecily M. Costello, Gary C. White

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2016)

Article Ecology

Detecting grizzly bear use of ungulate carcasses using global positioning system telemetry and activity data

Michael R. Ebinger, Mark A. Haroldson, Frank T. van Manen, Cecily M. Costello, Daniel D. Bjornlie, Daniel J. Thompson, Kerry A. Gunther, Jennifer K. Fortin, Justin E. Teisberg, Shannon R. Pils, P. J. White, Steven L. Cain, Paul C. Cross

OECOLOGIA (2016)

Article Zoology

Using diets of Canis breeding pairs to assess resource partitioning between sympatric red wolves and coyotes

Joseph W. Hinton, Annaliese K. Ashley, Justin A. Dellinger, John L. Gittleman, Frank T. van Manen, Michael J. Chamberlain

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY (2017)

Article Ecology

Potential paths for male-mediated gene flow to and from an isolated grizzly bear population

Christopher P. Peck, Frank T. van Manen, Cecily M. Costello, Mark A. Haroldson, Lisa A. Landenburger, Lori L. Roberts, Daniel D. Bjornlie, Richard D. Mace

ECOSPHERE (2017)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Carnivore hotspots in Peninsular Malaysia and their landscape attributes

Shyamala Ratnayeke, Frank T. van Manen, Gopalasamy Reuben Clements, Noor Azleen Mohd Kulaimi, Stuart P. Sharp

PLOS ONE (2018)

Article Ecology

Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans)

Joseph W. Hinton, John L. Gittleman, Frank T. van Manen, Michael J. Chamberlain

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans)

Joseph W. Hinton, Frank T. van Manen, Michael J. Chamberlain

PLOS ONE (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Red Wolves (Canis rufus)

Joseph W. Hinton, Christine Proctor, Marcella J. Kelly, Frank T. van Manen, Michael R. Vaughan, Michael J. Chamberlain

PLOS ONE (2016)

Article Ecology

Estimating distemper virus dynamics among wolves and grizzly bears using serology and Bayesian state-space models

Paul C. Cross, Frank T. van Manen, Mafalda Viana, Emily S. Almberg, Daniel Bachen, Ellen E. Brandell, Mark A. Haroldson, Peter J. Hudson, Daniel R. Stahler, Douglas W. Smith

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)

Article Ecology

Thermal constraints on energy balance, behaviour and spatial distribution of grizzly bears

Savannah A. Rogers, Charles T. Robbins, Paul D. Mathewson, Anthony M. Carnahan, Frank T. van Manen, Mark A. Haroldson, Warren P. Porter, Taylor R. Rogers, Terence Soule, Ryan A. Long

Summary: The heat dissipation limit theory suggests that the energy available for growth and reproduction in endotherms is constrained by their ability to dissipate heat. Research found that environmental temperature has a significant impact on the behavior and ecological performance of female mammals.

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY (2021)

Article Biology

Quantifying energetic costs and defining energy landscapes experienced by grizzly bears

Anthony M. Carnahan, Frank T. van Manen, Mark A. Haroldson, Gordon B. Stenhouse, Charles T. Robbins

Summary: Studies show that the cost of uphill movement for grizzly bears increases with speed and slope angle linearly, while uphill travel at slower speeds is more costly than horizontal travel. The most efficient walking speed for grizzly bears is 1.19 m/s, yet bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem move at an average velocity of 0.61 m/s and prefer near-horizontal slopes. Grizzly bears choose paths across slopes that are 54% less steep and costly than the maximum available slope when traveling uphill or downhill.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Ecology

Responses of American black bears to spring resources

Nathaniel R. Bowersock, Andrea R. Litt, Jerod A. Merkle, Kerry A. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen

Summary: The study investigated the impact of spring food resources on American black bears, finding that their movements were influenced by the quality of vegetative food resources. Despite being described as opportunistic foragers, the results suggest that black bears actively seek out areas with high-quality food when available.

ECOSPHERE (2021)

Article Ecology

Spatial variation in density of American black bears in northern Yellowstone National Park

Nathaniel R. Bowersock, Andrea R. Litt, Michael A. Sawaya, Kerry A. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen

Summary: The study examines the influence of resource availability on the distribution and density of American black bears in Yellowstone National Park. Using genetic sampling and spatially explicit capture-recapture models, the researchers found that black bear density was higher in forested areas compared to non-forested areas. Female black bears had higher densities than males in 2017. The study provides the first spatially explicit estimates of black bear density in an ecosystem that contains a diverse range of large mammal species.

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2023)

Article Ecology

Grizzly bear responses to restrictions of recreation in Yellowstone National Park

Elise A. Loggers, Andrea R. Litt, Frank T. van Manen, Mark A. Haroldson, Kerry A. Gunther

Summary: As outdoor recreation increases and people venture farther into wildland areas, it becomes more difficult for animals to avoid humans. Restricting human access to wildlife habitats can be an effective tool in mitigating the impact of human recreational activities, but its efficacy is rarely evaluated. A study in Yellowstone National Park found that grizzly bears selectively choose areas designated as bear management areas (BMAs) regardless of whether human access is restricted or not, based on availability of food resources and season.

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2023)

暂无数据