4.4 Article

Single-Patterned Metamaterial Structure Enabling Multi-band Perfect Absorption

期刊

PLASMONICS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 95-102

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-016-0234-1

关键词

Metamaterial; Perfect absorber; Multi-band absorption; Terahertz

资金

  1. Jiangsu provincial Research Center of Light Industrial Optoelectronic Engineering and Technology [BM2014402]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP115A13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-band or broadband perfect metamaterial absorbers, based on coplanar super-unit structure or multiple vertically stacked layers, have received intense attention because of their potential for practical applications. The resonance mechanism of them usually only utilizes the overlapping of the fundamental resonance of the different-sized patterns, and neglects the high-order resonance of the structure, and thus making the proposed structures quite troublesome to be fabricated and the mechanism of the current demonstrated absorbers lack of novelty. In this paper, a simple design of dual-band terahertz absorber consisted of only a traditional square metallic patch and a dielectric layer on top of a continuous ground plane is presented. Simulation results show that the single resonant structure has two resonance absorption peaks, which are both average over 99.5 %. The mechanism of the dual-band absorber is due to the overlapping of the fundamental mode and three-order response of the patterned structure, which is totally different from previous reports that only combining the fundamental resonances of the different-shaped complex structures to obtain the dual-band response. Furthermore, the proposed single-patterned structure can be used to extend the number of the absorption peaks (for example, triple-band absorber) by combining one more resonance (the five-order response). The proposed absorbers with the simple structure design have potential applications in many areas, such as detection, sensing, and selective thermal emitters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据