4.8 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: A Cotton Annexin Affects Fiber Elongation and Secondary Cell Wall Biosynthesis Associated with Ca2+ Influx, ROS Homeostasis, and Actin Filament Reorganization (Retracted article. See vol. 177, pg. 1773, 2018)

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 171, 期 3, 页码 1750-1770

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00597

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation in China [31471539]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [010-809001]
  3. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production [10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Annexins play pivotal roles in a variety of cellular processes as well as in fiber development; however, the functional mechanisms of their activities are unclear. Here, an annexin gene that is preferentially expressed in fibers, GhFAnnxA, was found to be significantly associated with various cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber traits. Transgenic analysis demonstrated that GhFAnnxA affected cotton fiber elongation and was involved in secondary cell wall (SCW) biosynthesis. Functional studies demonstrated that GhFAnnxA may act as a Ca2+ conductance regulator and that reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by Rbohs in a Ca2+-dependent manner may determine fiber elongation caused by elevated intracellular turgor and cell wall loosening. However, excessive hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) inhibited cotton fiber elongation in vitro. We speculate that a positive feedback loop involving ROS and Ca2+ is regulated by GhCDPK1 and regulates fiber cell elongation. Furthermore, the convergence of actin filaments is altered by their interaction with GhFAnnxA, and this also may contribute to fiber elongation. Moreover, GhFAnnxA may affect SCW biosynthesis through changes in cell wall components caused by an increase in H2O2 levels. These results not only provide new insights into the signaling pathways of GhFAnnxA in fiber development but also clarify the role of ROS in fiber development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据