4.8 Article

Ubiquitin-Proteasome Dependent Regulation of the GOLDEN2-LIKE 1 Transcription Factor in Response to Plastid Signals

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 173, 期 1, 页码 524-535

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01546

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program to Disseminate Tenure Tracking System
  2. Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [15K07843]
  4. University of Miyazaki
  5. Inamori Foundation
  6. [25850073]
  7. [26850065]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K07843, 26850065] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) GOLDEN2-LIKE (GLK) transcription factors promote chloroplast biogenesis by regulating the expression of photosynthesis-related genes. Arabidopsis GLK1 is also known to participate in retrograde signaling from chloroplasts to the nucleus. To elucidate the mechanism by which GLK1 is regulated in response to plastid signals, we biochemically characterized Arabidopsis GLK1 protein. Expression analysis of GLK1 protein indicated that GLK1 accumulates in aerial tissues. Both tissue-specific and Suc-dependent accumulation of GLK1 were regulated primarily at the transcriptional level. In contrast, norflurazon-or lincomycin-treated gun1-101 mutant expressing normal levels of GLK1 mRNA failed to accumulate GLK1 protein, suggesting that plastid signals directly regulate the accumulation of GLK1 protein in a GUN1-independent manner. Treatment of the glk1glk2 mutant expressing functional GFP-GLK1 with a proteasome inhibitor, MG-132, induced the accumulation of polyubiquitinated GFP-GLK1. Furthermore, the level of endogenous GLK1 in plants with damaged plastids was partially restored when those plants were treated with MG-132. Collectively, these data indicate that the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates in the degradation of Arabidopsis GLK1 in response to plastid signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据